<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackjack High-Low Card Count Shattered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/</link>
	<description>Start the Online Gaming on Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1099residentevil</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4939</link>
		<dc:creator>1099residentevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4939</guid>
		<description>so are you saying  2-9 are +1  and 10 is -2 and jack-king= -1  and aces are nothing? comment back. and are you completly sure about this? is it a stronger method?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so are you saying  2-9 are +1  and 10 is -2 and jack-king= -1  and aces are nothing? comment back. and are you completly sure about this? is it a stronger method?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moviemakerjjcasino</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4938</link>
		<dc:creator>Moviemakerjjcasino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4938</guid>
		<description>1099residentevil. 2-9 are +1 while10 and jack-king are -2. Aces are side counted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1099residentevil. 2-9 are +1 while10 and jack-king are -2. Aces are side counted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nephilas1</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4937</link>
		<dc:creator>nephilas1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4937</guid>
		<description>what would be the best position to count cards at the real tables?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what would be the best position to count cards at the real tables?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moviemakerjjcasino</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4936</link>
		<dc:creator>Moviemakerjjcasino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4936</guid>
		<description>nephilas 1. Sitting in the middle, as in the video, is the best position to count cards at double deck.. You are able to &quot;peek&quot; at others cards during insurance decisions and borderline calls like 16v10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nephilas 1. Sitting in the middle, as in the video, is the best position to count cards at double deck.. You are able to &#8220;peek&#8221; at others cards during insurance decisions and borderline calls like 16v10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nephilas1</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4935</link>
		<dc:creator>nephilas1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4935</guid>
		<description>thank you . how about when playing versus 6-8 decks instead of double deck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you . how about when playing versus 6-8 decks instead of double deck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moviemakerjjcasino</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4934</link>
		<dc:creator>Moviemakerjjcasino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4934</guid>
		<description>nephilas1. 6-8 decks are dealt face up, therefore it doesn&#039;t matter where you sit at the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nephilas1. 6-8 decks are dealt face up, therefore it doesn&#8217;t matter where you sit at the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nephilas1</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4933</link>
		<dc:creator>nephilas1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4933</guid>
		<description>what are your thought about the &quot;uston advanced point count&quot; ? is it good bad ? 
to complicated ? not worth it ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are your thought about the &#8220;uston advanced point count&#8221; ? is it good bad ?<br />
to complicated ? not worth it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moviemakerjjcasino</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4932</link>
		<dc:creator>Moviemakerjjcasino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4932</guid>
		<description>nephilas1. Ken Uston&#039;s book &quot;Million Dollar Blackjack&quot; that contains his APC is recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nephilas1. Ken Uston&#8217;s book &#8220;Million Dollar Blackjack&#8221; that contains his APC is recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nephilas1</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>nephilas1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>is your count stronger for 6-8 decks ? or double deck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is your count stronger for 6-8 decks ? or double deck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moviemakerjjcasino</title>
		<link>http://www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/comment-page-1/#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>Moviemakerjjcasino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-online-gaming.com/2010/02/09/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>nephilas1. My count is stronger at double deck because we will get more blackjacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nephilas1. My count is stronger at double deck because we will get more blackjacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.the-online-gaming.com/blackjack/blackjack-high-low-card-count-shattered/feed/ ) in 0.87020 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 5:03 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 6:03 am UTC -->
