Christian Marclay Roulette TV Excerpt
March 04, 2010 :: Posted by - admin :: Category - Roulette
Best Gambling Guides
Categories
- Baccarat
- Bingo
- Bingo Equipment
- Blackjack
- Blackjack Equipment
- Cases & Trays
- Casino Accessories
- Craps
- Craps & Dice Game Equipment
- Game Layouts
- Game Sets
- Game Tables
- Gaming Guides
- Gaming Wheels
- Horse Racing
- LasVegas
- Lotteries
- Online Bingo
- Online Gaming Special
- Pai Gow Equipment
- Playing Cards
- Poker
- poker chips
- Poker Equipment
- Roulette
- Slot Machine
- Sports Betting
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
March 4th, 2010 at 12:30 pm
agreed! i just wish i could play river sounds for my music theory teachers.
March 4th, 2010 at 12:51 pm
Gregorian chants have no harmony, a good interpretation of a romantic piece has no concrete rhythm as the performer speeds up and slows down for emphasis, drone music has no melody. Most people would call all of these things music; just because this has none of them, it doesn’t mean it is not music (besides, one could argue that it has all three).
March 4th, 2010 at 1:16 pm
this bitch can shut up already , she talks like a robot
March 4th, 2010 at 1:27 pm
duh.i hate artistic fags
March 4th, 2010 at 2:13 pm
Music can have no melody, or no harmony or rhythm. Music is culturally defined. What makes Bach more musical than a river? Society’s definition. So really, music is any sound. Everything vibrates and creates sound, so everything is music.
March 4th, 2010 at 2:41 pm
Ooooh. Maybe someday I’ll get an introduction like that….
March 4th, 2010 at 3:28 pm
where do you get records that have some of that stuff as music on it?
March 4th, 2010 at 4:14 pm
that woman is like a creepy robot, she freaks me out.
March 4th, 2010 at 4:28 pm
If that’s your definition of “music” then sure. In my opinion, music is just sound (or lack of sound like 4’33 by John Cage) created for the purpose of being music
March 4th, 2010 at 5:17 pm
lame!!!
March 4th, 2010 at 6:06 pm
my favorite part is the ‘rithm’!
March 4th, 2010 at 7:03 pm
Music is melody, harmony and rithm combined. These are only sounds, but are interesting, so this IS artistic combination of different sounds that’s what it is.
March 4th, 2010 at 7:31 pm
what is it then ?
don’t give that traditionalist narrowed minded speech about what is music and that it’s just possible to play it with string or percussion instruments because that’s a 19th century old obsolete thing to say. go and read Russolo’s Arte dei Rumori manifest… Things evolve, specially ART (music) !
March 4th, 2010 at 8:21 pm
She’s the host of Roulette TV. She’s also a pianist, for what it’s worth.
March 4th, 2010 at 8:39 pm
this isn’t music…sorry
March 4th, 2010 at 9:21 pm
This music describes well the state i’m in.
March 4th, 2010 at 10:13 pm
great.
but who on earth selected that freak woman to interview him!?
March 4th, 2010 at 10:23 pm
battle style
March 4th, 2010 at 11:16 pm
with a name like fibi rojet you know it.
March 4th, 2010 at 11:29 pm
It’s Marclay not Markley. WTF?
March 5th, 2010 at 12:03 am
that blonde is a little freak
March 5th, 2010 at 12:49 am
Sorry, my replies was posted below
March 5th, 2010 at 1:22 am
(2) Also, even though his first release was in mid 80′, his way to invent the use of turntables and his original techniques, influenced a lot of artists… Yes, it’s an own hypothesis that Markley too was feed by Tetreault’ works, but why not? because the guy begun his career 10 years before? I don’t think so. Again, did you ever saw Tetreault on stage? In all respect, we are far away your “Beatles-Radiohead” or “Kilmister-Squire” comparison.
March 5th, 2010 at 1:36 am
(1) Yes, I understand but if you insinuate that Tetreault’s work is more a “referential” and Markley more an “abstract” music, then you mist a lot of the work of Tetreault despite all your knowledge about him. From the begining T. was making very concrete music with turntables and still does. He then start to use more “referential” cuts especially with his work with other musicians. In fact, T. has a visual artist approach on sound and music. This was IMO the most important value of comparison.
March 5th, 2010 at 1:40 am
yes, of course… hence the comment. tetreault’s turntable work seems to begin in 1986-87 or so, whereas marclay was already quite active by the late 70s in both music and art circles using solely turntables… but that’s besides the point; their respective aesthetics couldn’t be any more different despite the similarity of their tools… you wouldn’t watch a clip of mötörhead and say that lemmy was “so chris squire” – even through they both play a rickenbacker bass…